Principles

Small Scale Principles| 16/6/17: Does more exploration allow knowing small scale working behavior? How? (Clarification required, 16/6/17) 
Isn’t here required to say on whose small scale behavior is expressed here? (Clarification required, 16/6/17)

Missing Principles| 15/6/17: Won’t I be not having experience on the common observed conformations which can be seen during complete exploration if I don’t explore completely? (Clarification required, 15/6/17)
Experience| I am thinking about elementary path, where I can skip thinking and randomly start knowing any of the compound conformation in the evolution of the world. (Clarification required, 15/6/17)

Principle Jagged Structures| 17/5/17: Nothing yet…

Vector Calculus Of Principles| 19/2/17: Think on finding the effective principle among all other principles in any particular context, as like finding the component of vectors along different directions. (Clarification required, 19/2/17)   

  

[Gen] Change Of Laws/Principles| 17/2/17: If we can change the way conformational elements act, doesn’t all the often seen conformations/arrangements, i.e. laws/principles change? (17/2/17)   

[Gen] Mathematics Of Principles| 17/2/17: If it is possible to change the properties of the conformations of the elements forming the often seen arrangements/conformations, is it possible to see different ways in which these changes can be made? If we can know the element which can arrange in different ways to produce the change in the then considered conformational element structure, won’t we be knowing the elements and their possible relations among them, i.e. the mathematics? (17/2/17) 

 

[Gen] Efficient Way Of Using All The Principles| 15/2/17: Expected Exploration| I got stuck on thinking whether to shift a group of thought to other category or not. I am using certain principles for creating categories; in that stuck position, I couldn’t get back to those known principles, to take reasoned decision. How to utilize all the known data effectively? Should I use algorithms? (15/2/17)  

 
[Gen] Principles Of Principles/Mathematics Of Principles| < 9/217: Isn’t there other way of creating math of principles than from using board games?

 

Beyond Principles| < 28/1/17: Nothing yet... 
 
Improper Principle System Detecting Principle Problem In Another System| 21/1/17: Explore this w.r.t your situation in college. (23/1/17) 
 
Conflicting Nature In Proverbs| 18/1/17: Experience| In my schooldays, I was seeing that some of the proverbs were in conflict with each other, and thought proverbs to be holding good only in certain specific contexts. (18/1/17)
Are proverbs and principles similar? (18/1/17)

Games And Principles| 17/1/17: Thoughts| Games seem to be dense source of principles. (17/1/17)
Supports (S)| Following extract is from the Peter Attia's The Full History of Board Games article:

Magie had invented and patented The Landlord’s Game in 1904 and designed the game to be a practical demonstration of land grabbing with all its usual outcomes and consequences. She based the game on the economic principles of Georgism, a system proposed by Henry George, with the object of demonstrating how rents enrich property owners and impoverish tenants.

She knew some people could find it hard to understand why this happened and what might be done about it, and thought if Georgist ideas were put into the concrete form of a game, they might be easier to demonstrate.

Identification:

Coming To An Identification| 13/4/17: Notion: I saw some of the laws, and had a notion of them being “simple“, but didn’t know on how they got that? (Clarification required, 13/4/17)

Identifying And Fixing The Progress Room | < 15/1/17: Experience Notion (EN) | I have observed that the progress of my any project to depend on certain improvement room. Think on this w.r.t the construction mathematical language. (15/1/17) 

Origins Of Identification | < 13/1/17: Nothing yet... 

To-Be-Identified Arena List Creation | 11/1/17: Think on identifying the arena of loose compound structures view as the elements. (11/1/17) 

Miscellaneous: Is the identification boosting the exploration? (8/1/17)
Thought: Is it optimal to know others identifications directly, without first trying? (Clarification required, 31/3/17)
Experience: I was thinking to see the meaning of “thinking” without first trying to identify it.
I seem to have taken a compound step by not knowing the evolution of sounds.
Am I basing all my exploration based on what I know (here I have before explored on compound step)?
Links: Alien automation; Compound Step; Genesis of new exploration from misunderstanding; thought arrangement based on origins;
Exploration Construction Based On Only Known Experience| 31/3/17: Can the wrong conclusion result from compound-experience-based exploration? (31/3/17) 
Links: Complete coverage from element to compound exploration;  

Known-But-Unidentified/Unsymbolised World And Unknown-Unidentified/Unsymbolised World; Expanding The Territory | 8/1/17: Nothing yet...

Identification-Scarcity-Not-Answerable Vs. Real-Not-Answerable | < 1/7/17: According to evolution, will there be any difficulty in the exploring mathematics or any other evolved system? What is making it difficult in college? Here I seem to have not yet identified or explored completely on this, but principle seems to be there always in the support. 

Slow Nature of Identifying the Known | < 6/1/17: Is the slow nature of identifying the known (?) caused by the restriction of language, of it not knowing proper expressions and, for the expression of which it requires fitting from the existing sounds/words? (< 6/1/17)

Algorithm for soothing to identify at a great small scale | 27/12/16: Nothing yet...

Discovering/Knowing the Unknown | 06/08/2016: Experience/Notion (E)| I thought on understanding the difference between raw sense experience (see parts of Exploration via pro-language in RTLP II) and that of its subset, spoken or written thoughts, as it is required for me to effectively use both of them. I had the same experiences of reading thoughts from books, but now I focused on seeing the relation between thought and sense experience, I came to know more about thoughts which existed before, but which I didn't see. (07/08/2016)

Hidden Nature Of Relations | < 13/1/17: What is causing the sense of relations being hidden?

---

Against The Elemental Principle | 11/1/17: Nothing yet... 
 
Chance Nature In The Conclusions From The Compound Exploratory Way Or Principle Run Human/System| 11/1/17: Nothing yet...     
 
How To Know All The Principles? | 10/1/17: Nothing yet...    
   
Vector Component Of The Principle | 8/1/17: Is it better to make the principles used for the action transparent, to allow changes when there is another productive principle. (8/1/17)
See if you can find scientific compound principles or laws not holding because of another principle or law being more elemental. (11/1/17)
 
What Are Principles? | < 8/1/17: Experience (E) | In Go game, I have seen the evolution of identification on the type of movement of pieces I should make to attain greater surrounding of the pieces or preventing the piece of mine being captured by the opposition, like not allowing more than two pieces to surround at the corner of the board (?), etc. (8/1/17)    
Thought (T) | Principles seem to be the reasoning–an identified relation, which will be used often to moderate the desired consequences of the action. Think more on giving greater clarity on this definition (?).
Questions do also drive action, are they then, principles? (8/1/17)
 
Progress Via Principles | < 7/1/17: Isn't progress via principle the shortest path? But, doesn't the sub-exploratory identifications help in filling up the vacant explorations, and to bring clarity? (clarification needed) 
 
Principle Proof Claims | < 7/1/17: Principle-against seems to have more value than just the exploratory-against; as on exploration won't there be answer for those "exploratory-angainsts"? . Collect experience for this.  
 
Culture and Principle | < 7/1/17: Can we construct books (like that of burnt Alexandria Library) of the lost culture only by knowing their principles? (clarification needed) 
 
Finding the Unknown Principle | 27/12/16: Nothing yet... 
 
Principle Employed Back Time Constructor | < 4/1/17: Nothing yet... 
 
Can I use Go game to know the origins of principles?  
 
Virus Algorithm: Nothing yet...
 
It seems to be all about having strong principles, which can be later used to explore principles.    
Is principle of need more elementary? Isn't there any other opposing principle?  
 
Think on all-principle sweeping algorithm. (05/12/16) 
Principles = Algorithm Lines? (05/12/16)    

Creation or Origin of principles| 04/11/16: Nothing yet... 

 

Principles: If there is a clash of principles, I need to choose the most effective one. Now, I have got the principle which is restricting me from studying the college data--because of me not receiving the data in the right organized evolutionary way; and on the other hand there is another principle which says me to not waste time. If I can find a "big" principle which decides the best of the clashing principles, then the problem seems to get resolved with a share of following both the principles. (16/06/2016)
I don't think the above to be a clash but rather the competition between principles on which gets followed in the execution process. (16/06/2016)
What do you think principles are? (16/06/2016)
Principles are thoughts which guide one for a proper action? (16/06/2016)
It seems important to have as many principles  as possible, as effectiveness percentage of a principle seems to dampen due to other counter principles. (04/11/16, clarification needed)
 

What about locating the principles and then verifying them?
Should I first try having experience on the origin of principles?
Explore principles using scientific laws.
Try knowing the nature of principles.
I seem to have already used principles to attain the present order of knowledge.

Why is it taking more time to know the known? Think on the origins of thought. Try speeding up the process of thinking.

Knowing Oneself: James R. Hurford [author of The Origins of Language] is bringing up the generality of problems associated with learning in an environment without eliminating the instincts. (27/05/2016)
Main awareness should be on not becoming the victim of default automation, instincts, involuntary unconscious drive. (28/05/2016)
We might not know certain reasons, being ignorant always, so one should always be cautious when they think to have been reasonable. Some times we might not take the action on something which bring ease in what we are doing, we find the ease only when we search for it. (30/05/2016)
It seems that one needs to know what he/she wants, it seems to be then that he/she may get it. (30/05/2016 | edited on 29/6/17)