Skip to main content

Organization

Daughter branches of this section: 


Utility-Imagination Fulfillment Path-Visibility Scale| 19/6/17: Nothing yet; clarification required.

Utility: To ease the process of achieving utility.
Utility: 
Ease System For Finding The General-Exploration/Utility-Exploration| 3/5/17: Does writing utilities behind all explorations now ease in choosing the exploration of greater utility? (3/5/17)
Need I indicate on how much a thought has helped to come near a particular utility? (3/5/17)
How to measure the utility of the thought? (7/5/17)
Utility (Efficiency?) Measure From All The Thoughts| 3/5/17: Clarification required; nothing yet… 
Tracking Utility| 3/5/17:
I seem to not know the utility behind all the structures in the blog. Don’t I need to track it? (3/5/17)
Explorations Made Without Knowing The Utility| 3/5/17: Nothing yet…
Stability Of The Structure/Action With Hidden/Not-Clearly-Seen Or No Utility| 3/5/17: Experience: I created certain features (e.g. Thought Organizer, Algorithm, Exploration Module) which were not used again. (3/5/17)
Utility Toward-Orientation Sensitivity| 29/4/17: Expected Exploration: Microscopic deviation of action from intended utility. (Clarification required, 29/4/17)
What is the reason for deviation from utility at the “microscopic” (smaller) scale? (Clarification required, 3/5/17)
Complete-Utility-Oriented Construction Of System| 3/5/17: Does microscopic utility construction of the system give greater stability, from having utility at every microscopic action? (Clarification required, 4/5/17)
Increasing The Speed Of Finding The Utility And Constructing The Structure Based On it| 4/5/17: Nothing yet…

Algorithm| 30/3/17: If I can collect all the recurring steps to go through it later, won’t it be helpful? How do I make this? (30/3/17)
Algorithm Of Finding Exploration Type| 30/4/17: Nothing yet…

Should I Record All The Thoughts| 12/3/17: Nothing yet… 

Modification Requirements| 12/3/17:
When there is no clarity in the need of modification, need I wait till the need is clearly seen? (12/3/17)

[Gen] Other Optimal Ways Of Organization Than The Categorization Way| 28/2/17: Nothing yet…

Real-Time Quick Recording With Edition| 28/2/17: Experience| Now often, I am writing my faint thoughts in my book to quickly hold them up, then I edit them and put into thought groups. How to make this final recording in the real time? (28/2/17)

Modifications Execution Status| 25/2/17:  
Should I include branches link of a main group (example: analysis site design link) in the main raw thought launch pad page? (25/2/17) 
Advantages: Does this help in choosing better thought group category among similar ones?  
Doesn’t this also help in better categorization (example: by seeing whether other categories which can come as sub under others is being given a separate one, we can re-categorize)?
Doesn’t this help in better easy navigation system by the exposition and access of all the sub-links, without going into the main link?
Disadvantages: I have inserted all the sub-links, but it is taking lot of space?
Should I take un-categorized thoughts to a new page? (25/2/17)
Advantages: This might eliminate the viewer from seeing poor quality data.
Disadvantages: Nothing yet… 
Think on writing the number of times of occurrence of advantageous/disadvantageous conformation due to the modification, if it is already under use. (25/2/17)
In which category should I add “Decision” sub-link: Algorithm, or Thinking? If it is not clear on where to add it, should I give it separate major link. (25/2/17) 
Advantages: Many of the “decision” thoughts were found in Algorithm page; and giving a separate main link might separate the thought group from other related thoughts. 
Disadvantages: Nothing yet…  

Algorithm For Shifting Thought Groups| 25/2/17: Experience| When I read thought groups under certain category like of this page “Organization”, I am not able to make proper decision on where to place certain thoughts. Should I include the thought of “Building Exploration Machine” in exploratory way section, or should I include it in the more miscellaneous section? (25/2/17)

Order Of Adding Thoughts To Site After Refining/Editing Them| 25/2/17: Experience| After recording my thoughts in short form, I see many thoughts to be edited and added to Analysis site, how do I choose on which to be added to the site first? (25/2/17) 

Recording Faint Thoughts| 23/2/17: Should I record faint thoughts? (23/2/17)

Faint Principle Finder| 22/2/17: I group related thoughts in a new page. When I am adding a new thought to a group, I try searching any left out thought in other broad groups, to add it into the narrow group. Should I add a left-out thought only when a new thought related to the group is being added? (22/2/17) 
Should the multiple questions be represented in the same division like this:     
‘Doesn’t the continuous utility and need determine the permanency? What if the optimal structure get created to fulfill the same need and utility, to destroy the past structure? Won’t that structure evolve out of the past structure itself? (Clarification required, 22/2/17)” Or should it be divided into many lines with each questions? (22/2/17) 
Should I include faint thoughts? (22/2/17)

Inliniev Needs| 19/2/17: Name Origins| I am using the word “inliniev” for compressing the notion found when I wanted to have inline editing for my blog, to reduce the time in switching between editing and reading views; I didn’t get the inline editing ability in the blog, but Open live Writer gave an alternative (?) for that.  

[Gen] Eliminating The Recording/Organizing Time/No Friction Floating Speed Of Thought  Exploration| 19/2/17: Is it possible to eliminate the time used in organizing and recording thought, by having automated organization and recording, to have high pace thinking progress? (19/2/17)  
Think on using speech-to-text tool to increase the speed of recording and organizing thoughts. (19/217)   
 
Speed Of Thinking Vs. Speed Of Recording| 22/2/17: Nothing yet… 
Typing Vs. Writing Vs. SpeechToText-ing Vs. HandwritingToDigitalText-ing| < 18/2/17: Which is easy: typing, writing, speechtotext-ing or handwritingtodigitaltext-ing? (18/2/17)  
 
Transparency On The Reasoning For Specific Design| < 15/2/17: Should I include a link to a page containing the reasoning for specific designing (to enable clarity exploration for further evolution/improvement) of the recurring (found in many places of site) elements of site, to eliminate repetition of the reasoning at the multiple places where elements occur?   
   
Think on adding the reason for every modification made in the blog. 
 
Need Of Mendeley Browser Extension| 11/2/17: What is the need of Mendely, when you can already use bookmarks of Mozilla Firefox to hold the mark of all the important article and book I read?  
 
Need Of Review| 9/2/17: Summary seems to concentrate more on the content of the entire article/book considered, and not on the specific data the reader wanted to extract from it. I thought of writing reviews since now, to have a map of the book/article I read. But, I don’t see any need of it, it seems enough to know the name of the article/book I read. Won’t it be then optimal to write pages as like the present one, to categorize according to my need, and start collecting data for it from different sources? (10/2/17)  
 
Blog Vs. Book| 5/2/17: Why do you write in book instead of directly putting it in blog, if you are seeing blog to have more organization flexibility or customization ability?
I seem to forget thoughts quickly; for quick holding of thought, it seems better to write it in book in short form and then, expand and edit it properly in the blog. (5/2/17)    
Try avoiding multiple stages here, i.e. think on organizing thoughts in the real time. (7/2/17) 
   
[Gen] First Principle Base Constructed Thoughts| < 7/2/17: Experience Notion Keywords (ENK)| Constructing back the origins of board games with frequent updates.   
 
Tools Used In The Making Of My Blog| 2/2/17: Should I also write on the tools/softwares used in the making of my blog or the history of the evolution of blog building elements? (2/2/17)  
 
Review:  
Intense Effective Reviewing Style| < 28/1/17: Nothing yet… 
Renaming Review| < 2/2/17: Think on changing the name “review” with the proper word on what you are writing under that name. (< 2/2/17)   
Real Time Reviewing| < 2/2/17: Think on writing review as you read, as this might help in not loosing certain exploration, and even on getting in-depth analysis or using the content to a complete microscopical extent. (< 2/2/17)   
Think on writing the time and date along with the thoughts, as you write in the real time. (2/2/17) 
Structure Of The Review| 2/2/17: Think on writing the review in a way to extract back the entire data given in the source. Is it possible to create a navigation-friendly-map overview? (< 29/1/17)

Representing The Principles Behind The Structures| 281/17: Think on writing the need of adding experiences along with thoughts. (< 28/1/17)    
 
Need Of Posts And Pages| 23/1/17: Nothing yet... 
 
Manual Arrangement Of Posts| 23/1/17: Is it better to make home page as the collection of posts tracing the summary of data/experience I receive everyday? (23/1/17) 
Should I also have arrangement of posts depending on their elemental character? (23/1/17)  
 
Tracing Of Important Experience| 21/1/17: Can compressing (via summary) the important data/experience I have in the main home page help in revising back the matter (in case of book experience, with the chance of going to it back) or at least getting that feel back (in case of the record of direct experience, which can't be seen again). (22/1/17) 
Is it necessary to write the review/summary only after completing the book? Is it not appropriate to write the summary when the density is high? How to measure the density? (23/1/17)   
I started writing the review of the article Board Games Reconsidered which I read, but saw that I was writing more on the content of article than on the content for which I read it. Is it optimal to include all the data (from different sources, and not just from one article/book) under page with the name of intention I am reading anything? Here, yes I will have record of only the data used for my intentions, but doesn’t keep record data which were not part of it and which I read. Doesn’t this not allow me to use the same data for other purposes? How? (Clarification required, 12/2/17) 

Search html/javascript/other-code for enabling inline (ajax) editing. (22/1/17) 
 
What is the need of article/book review for the person writing it? (17/1/17) 
 
Think on adding "origins" along with "experience" in the RTLP section. (16/1/17) 
 
After subscribing to your site, why would others want to see subscription options back again, won't it obstruct their thinking? Think on hiding it. (B11P158, 15/1/17) 
 
Purpose-Conscious-No-Divergence-Anchoring Of Content| 14/1/17: Nothing yet...
 
Forgotten Symbolized Notion | 10/1/17: Experience (E) | I sometimes don't understand what I have wrote in the blog.
Thought (T) | Need you delete them, if you fail to find meaning? (10/1/17) 

Description | 10/1/17: Can description catch hold of the unidentified or un-symbolized notions?  (10/1/17)
 
Think on hover feature to indicate the reason/principle behind the design of each element of the blog. (8/1/17) 
 
Measuring The Exploration Density Attained Per Day | 8/1/17: Nothing yet...
   
One of the advantages of writing new thought to the top is on its ease to not scroll down to the bottom, to write the new one. But, this doesn't seem to be a main factor to be based as a reason to perform this act of writing at the top, than as a just an identified consequence. (8/1/17)  
   
Thin on adding life simulation feature. Shall I open up a new page for adding general thought competitors?

Think on bringing more attention to general thoughts. (04/1/17)

Think on bringing major thoughts in a page to the top, and those others to the bottom. (6/1/17)

Notice the difference between the RTLP section and Exploration module section, as they evolve.
 
New Features: Right now, it seems that, exploration module is not reader-friendly; only when you make it friendly, it seem that, your decisions will be clear. (B11P85, 07/11/16)
I should try concentrating the thoughts. (B11P85, 07/11/16)
Should I add LIVE feature? (B11P85, 08/11/16)
Should I include "To do list" in my algorithm? Think more on this. (B11P85, 10/11/16)
If my decisions are truly strong, I should also try creating summary of my decision.  And even think on how I could have arrived at that decision early. Keep revising your decision everyday. (B11P87, 10/11/16)
What about introducing the feature "question to keep in mind"? (14/11/16)
Should I group the similar thought groups under the same unique thought number, with different variable names? Would this reduce any advantageous outcome from the past no-similar grouping arrangement? (27/11/16)
Think on creating a record of every activity after each hour. (<26/11/16)
Should I first think on every thought here in Exploration module and then send only the important thoughts to RTLP? (27/11/16) 
a. Think more on getting all the organization of thought within the book. (27/11/16)
b. Advantage of writing in blog is that it offers the ability of importing one time typed text into different space to help proper grouping, but this is not possible in book. (27/11/16)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog