Utility: For optimal use of books' data;
Relative(to the one forming)-Not-Intended Identifications Of Us And Relative-Not-Wanted Identifications Of Books| 16/5/17: Aren't the identifications given in books, which I seem to be not taking into journal, as I do for other thoughts intended for not losing them and to connect them for other utilities, need to be also remembered? (Clarification required, 16/5/17)
Customization In Books| 15/1/17: Experience (E)| I have read few books, where I am seeing that data seems to deviate often from what I had expected from the source. (15/1/17)
Thought (T)| As the length of source increases, deviation seems to increase with it. (B11P158, 15/1/17)
Reading journal articles seems to be short, and may provide the expected dense experience.
Authors of the books seem to have tendency of increasing the length even when there is no enough data, this might lead to dilution. (29/1/17)
Every book seems to have their own principle of exploration; all the matter of the book seems to be exploration based on it.
Books X-Ray: It seems better to read book review first, before taking the decision of reading a book. (03/06/2016)
Before reading a book one must understand what level of details one wants. (29/05/2016)
I might have read a book on a purpose, but might not have attained what was intended. This should not stop me from reading another book on the same topic again. (01/06/2016)
While one can draw an outline of a valuable book, the rest of the pudding which the outline/review has not drawn is meant for connecting one's experiences with that of book's to get the outcome of what one desires. (06/06/2016)
It is not a rule that I should read the entire book, you can read only few pages which has got the content you need. Use cropping skill to absorb only the needed parts or to exclude the parts for which you are not ready. (09/06/2016)
Often the fresh eye seems to see lot of difficulties in the scene than the experienced one. (29/05/2016)
Algorithm for Choosing A Book: Check if there is a book on your entire purpose before reading a book on tools/ways of achieving that same big goal. (04/06/2016)
Greater one knows on what he/she wants from a book, greater seems to be utility of the book. (04/2016)
Is it not possible to utilize a resource to a greater extent if one doesn't know clearly what he/she wants from it? (04/06/2016)
Having a definite purpose might narrow down the utility of the resource, thus might even reduce the entire utility of the resource. (04/06/2016)
I need to mathematize all these factors to optimize the decision. (04/06/2016)
Apart from the reasoning, there seems to be a need to take care of the quality of data a book provides. (07/06/2016)
The main problem is that the same amount of content can be of varied quality. It is important to get the best quality content in concise manner. (07/06/2016)
Keep searching for videos on talks given by the authors of the book which you desire to read, as an option. (<26/06/2016).
Algorithm to Search research data: Step 1: Search for short articles in google.
Step 2: Search for the same (for books) in Amazon.
Step 3: Search via Google Scholar.
Step 4: Search for videos.
Step 5: Search for master piece books or main personalities on the concept of consideration. (B1, <25/06/2016)
Books Rating System w.r.t Each Topic|26/11/16: Nothing yet...
Evolution of Uniqueness of Data| 24/12/16: Can we expect ahead books with more precise details (zoomed layer of data) on the data a book contains? (24/12/16)
Relative(to the one forming)-Not-Intended Identifications Of Us And Relative-Not-Wanted Identifications Of Books| 16/5/17: Aren't the identifications given in books, which I seem to be not taking into journal, as I do for other thoughts intended for not losing them and to connect them for other utilities, need to be also remembered? (Clarification required, 16/5/17)
Customization In Books| 15/1/17: Experience (E)| I have read few books, where I am seeing that data seems to deviate often from what I had expected from the source. (15/1/17)
Thought (T)| As the length of source increases, deviation seems to increase with it. (B11P158, 15/1/17)
Reading journal articles seems to be short, and may provide the expected dense experience.
Authors of the books seem to have tendency of increasing the length even when there is no enough data, this might lead to dilution. (29/1/17)
Every book seems to have their own principle of exploration; all the matter of the book seems to be exploration based on it.
Books X-Ray: It seems better to read book review first, before taking the decision of reading a book. (03/06/2016)
Before reading a book one must understand what level of details one wants. (29/05/2016)
I might have read a book on a purpose, but might not have attained what was intended. This should not stop me from reading another book on the same topic again. (01/06/2016)
While one can draw an outline of a valuable book, the rest of the pudding which the outline/review has not drawn is meant for connecting one's experiences with that of book's to get the outcome of what one desires. (06/06/2016)
It is not a rule that I should read the entire book, you can read only few pages which has got the content you need. Use cropping skill to absorb only the needed parts or to exclude the parts for which you are not ready. (09/06/2016)
Often the fresh eye seems to see lot of difficulties in the scene than the experienced one. (29/05/2016)
Algorithm for Choosing A Book: Check if there is a book on your entire purpose before reading a book on tools/ways of achieving that same big goal. (04/06/2016)
Greater one knows on what he/she wants from a book, greater seems to be utility of the book. (04/2016)
Is it not possible to utilize a resource to a greater extent if one doesn't know clearly what he/she wants from it? (04/06/2016)
Having a definite purpose might narrow down the utility of the resource, thus might even reduce the entire utility of the resource. (04/06/2016)
I need to mathematize all these factors to optimize the decision. (04/06/2016)
Apart from the reasoning, there seems to be a need to take care of the quality of data a book provides. (07/06/2016)
The main problem is that the same amount of content can be of varied quality. It is important to get the best quality content in concise manner. (07/06/2016)
Keep searching for videos on talks given by the authors of the book which you desire to read, as an option. (<26/06/2016).
Algorithm to Search research data: Step 1: Search for short articles in google.
Step 2: Search for the same (for books) in Amazon.
Step 3: Search via Google Scholar.
Step 4: Search for videos.
Step 5: Search for master piece books or main personalities on the concept of consideration. (B1, <25/06/2016)
Books Rating System w.r.t Each Topic|26/11/16: Nothing yet...
Evolution of Uniqueness of Data| 24/12/16: Can we expect ahead books with more precise details (zoomed layer of data) on the data a book contains? (24/12/16)