Mathematical Language

[Gen] Use Of Abstractness Property In Language| 28/2/17: Nothing yet…

[Gen] Unique Representation Of Notion| 26/2/17: Doesn’t unique representation of notion in language allow incremental development of the structure? Doesn’t this also help in better navigation system via the search for specific name of the notion? (Clarification required, 26/2/17)
How to construct unique representation of notion? (28/2/17)

Machine Friendly/Machine Producible Language| 16/1/17: If language representation of an object in the real world is based on relations, won’t it be possible to use machines in thinking/exploration more easily? (7/2/17)  

Is the [Gen] non-existence of proper elements (?) making it difficult to construct relations or math in language? (Clarification required, 21/2/17)
How are humans finding elements for exploration? (Clarification required, 12/3/17)
Humans seem to be using memory to refer to an action in reality using sounds of a language without any clear relation (?); example: we may produce the sound “chair” for representing the object chair. Can’t this be done by machines, if we can assign sounds to refer to particular conformation of the world? (12/3/17)
More than using non-clear relation sounds to represent conformations, don’t humans know the relation between the conformations/actions they represent via sounds/language? If we can give the relations between the actions, can’t machines do the same exploration? (12/3/17)
If we can construct a relational nomenclature like that of IUPAC nomenclature for chemical compounds, or a Morse Code, to represent EVERY conformation of the world that our sound languages are able or not able, can’t the automation of exploration or thinking be more easy? Won’t the naming of conformations be also become automated? (Clarification required, 12/3/17)
Need I now start developing a relational language, i.e. a language with clear relation between its sounds and to the conformation it is representing? How to construct it? (12/3/17)

Expressing in a way which makes the pattern easily seen (if it exists), might contribute for easy matching of similar conformations. [experience: Stephen Sir and RD Ma'am showed matrix and other arrangements showing patterns] (19/07/2016)

Mathematical Human Language: For ease, see first: Different types of Mathematics (DTM), Origins of Language (OL), Generality (Patterns in Thinking) (PT).
We need to create a mathematical language which should enable everyone to express everything with a short vocabulary. (30/05/2016) 

All the properties of the experiences expressed by the language seems to be categorized as the ones with high, moderate and low intensity of any property. The intensity of what is described would not be clear, the users must have a pre-tangible experience with the experience communicated via language. (08/06/2016, see OL)
Most of the words used now doesn't seem to involve relational picking of sounds to express the experience but rather seems to use memory of sounds which have got attached to a meaning with the continuous usage. (08/06/2016)

Relational picking of sounds might prove to be slow in the beginning of the communication. Why? (8/06/2016)
We should invoke relational picking of words in language, as they will help in creating auto-math research or algebra of relational elements used; it is happening even now with the present languages with limited relational capacities involved in analogies and metaphors.(8/06/2016, see DTM)

Now language is only using intensity of different properties. For one of the possibility, if each and every production of sound in vocal tract is given specific relation to represent, then this could be more mathematically powerful. Now language is using memory to attach a meaning directly without much using any relation; why not create relational words and then use memory, isn’t this better than just using memory without having any relation? (8/06/2016)

Building relational language seems to be difficult. We can start invoking relation as much as possible to represent an experience using math and sound elements by suppressing the memory usage on the way. By doing the same, in the path of evolution, at the end there would only remain the language which uses relations without any memory requirement except for syntactic elements. (8/06/2016)
We need to create a language with metaphorical and relational ability embedded in the sounds used for communication. (9/06/2016)

Symbolic/Mathematical Logic seems to be the field which is trying to create relations using special symbols, whose ambition is also to create language which can express reasoning using the elements which have relations among them, but doesn't seem to be more powerful than the one we are trying to create, I.e. the one which can replace present human language instead of just being an auxiliary isolated system. (9/06/2016) 

One of the powerful features of math is that it gives a easy flow of thinking, even sometimes the thinking going faster than the comparison rate of the thinking under went! (B1, 26/06/2016)

Mathematics seems to help attain in-depth knowledge easily without knowing to have thought (!), which is difficult to attain via present human language. (2/07/2016)

Is the non-existence of elementary conformation sounds, making us have many sounds for complex conformations? Or is it difficult to form complex conformation sounds from the elementary sounds (say, the mathematical point, which can form any conformation)? (3/10/2016)

What determines the generality of a complex conformation, I.e. what determines the recurrence of the same conformation? Should the complex conformation have the configuration which is easily attainable, or any such ease factors? (3/10/2016)

Are present language sounds the same as complex elements?

Representation of the notion of exploratory way, that the complex elements usage to be easier to represent conformations than the simple elements: I have represented small dots to represent simplest elements, whose usage to construct complex conformations may time long time. If we use complex elements constructed from them--about which we may be aware of or not, I.e. we may either know that the complex structure consists of elements or we may not; I see exploratory ways and language sounds to be complex elements whose simplest elements we are not yet aware of--it might be easy to represent conformations quickly, this might lead to creation of complex elements, which I have represented using the three figures, pentagon, rectangle (?), curvy. The use of pentagons to create is depicted in the last portion of the above picture.

As these elements require lot of expansion to construct the whole, it seems that most common or general complexes--composed of elements, come to stand as artificial (?) elements. Is it difficult to express these elemental conformations? (3/10/2016)
 
See first: Discovery/Exploration. It seems better to know elements and then create complex conformations (= exploratory ways?) from it, without any prior complex experience; now, we seem to be experiencing and then forming complex general conformation sounds (exploratory ways). If we can form our own experience, it seems like artificial tailored experience. (Clarification required, 3/10/2016)

Does the recurring conformation (would it be general?) be named first, as it will be always in need to be communicated by one for the expression? (15/3/17)