Abstract/General Vs. Narrow/Real-Conformation Expression| 14/7/17;17: When is narrow/real-conformation expression optimal? (Clarification required; 14/7/17; 17)
Faster Expression Of The Mind Conformations| 7/7/17;5: Experience| I was not able to write what I thought (on easing small actions?) quickly.
Links: Language of thoughts?; Hamilton?; clarification required;
Use Of Commas| 2/7/17: Am I using commas in certain cases where the not having it, would give different meaning? (Clarification required; 2/7/17)
How to know such expressions/statements(?)? (Clarification required; 2/7/17)
Changes In The-Conformations-A-Sound/Word-Represents (Definition?)| 28/6/17;20: Origin| From writing the conformations representation of “Exploration”; see 28/6/17;19. From the changes in definition I had known before in certain subjects.
Does the expressed conformations a sound/word represents change when experience for which the sound/word is used, mismatches with the expression? (Clarification required; 28/1/17; 20)
Complete Expression| 27/6/17;6: Nothing yet…
Difficulty In Particular Expression In Particular Languages| 27/6/17;5: Is it when we are not able to express the intended conformation, that we need new expression? (27/6/17; 5)
Precise Expression| 23/6/17;19: Experience| I was reading chemistry, and from certain source I came to know that the bond length between two (carbon?) atoms to be 1.4 Angstrom, and the diameter of (carbon?) atom to be 2.2 Angstroms. I drew the line of distance l.4, the one which is there near to the sentence written in the image, and drew an atom, as the distance between two atoms is 1.4, I thought the ending surface of the atom need to be shorter than the distance, so I drew the atom with ending curve shorter the 1.4 Angstrom distance. For the second atom, I saw that the distance between two atomic centers to be 1.4, but the radius of the atom to be only 1.1 Angstroms, then again I drew the curve of the atom shorter than the distance between them. Later due to certain thought (related to covalent bond?), I started thinking it to be wrong. Later I drew the diagram by using scale, the one with two atoms at the bottom of the image below, then I saw that two curves intersect each other. Before while thinking due to imprecise representation, I had come to wrong conclusion. (23/6/17; 19)
Thought| Does precise expression eliminate wrong conclusions? | How? (24/6/17; 2 | 27/6/17; 1)
Choosing Words/Sounds| 19/6/17: Experience| I am using the word “allow” in certain sentences where I was using “helps”. Expected Exploration: Why am I tending to use “allow”? (19/6/17)
Reality Expression Vs. Metaphor Expression| 18/6/17: Nothing yet…
Seeing The Need Of Every Word| 24/6/17;1: Nothing yet…
Need Of Using The Word Seems| 18/6/17: Doesn’t that allow seeing other possibilities in every exploration? (Clarification required, 18/6/17)
Utility: To not forget the notion;
Imprecise Expression Consequences And Precise Expression Consequences| 12/6/17: Nothing yet…
Solidity Of Notion Before And After Giving A Sound/Word (Expression/Name)| 3/5/17: Clarification required; Nothing yet…
Appearance| 15/4/17: Experience| I felt (?) a difference in appearance of the same content in the default PDF viewer of my phone (Google PDF viewer?) and that in XODO Docs. There are black gaps in the default viewer and white patches in XODO. I felt ease with XODO (?) (Expecting notion solidity; Clarification required; 15/4/17)
Context-Lossless Expression| 13/4/17: I seem to be using the context of thought or the support of thoughts in the group, for expression. Is it not possible to make each expression stand independently? (13/4/17)
Construction Principles Behind Symbols, Paintings And Detailed Expressive Language Symbols| 30/3/17: Nothing yet…
Links: Optimal expression for automation of exploration (?);
Representation:
Most of the syntax friendly thoughts seems to be not completely trust worthy, in their word to word resolution test. (03/11/16)
Try adding the badge or notification"Verified Experience Friendly Language (EFL)", in every group of thoughts to ensure the quality. Try bringing more categories of this kind. (03/11/16)
Evolution Of Standard Syntax/Ready-Made Thought Suits| 18/2/17: Do syntax act as ready to use suits for the expression of reality, without any need to transfer the reality into their corresponding precise language sounds/words? (19/2/17)
Is the use of syntax proportional to imprecise expression of the reality? (19/2/17)
Faster Expression Of The Mind Conformations| 7/7/17;5: Experience| I was not able to write what I thought (on easing small actions?) quickly.
Links: Language of thoughts?; Hamilton?; clarification required;
Use Of Commas| 2/7/17: Am I using commas in certain cases where the not having it, would give different meaning? (Clarification required; 2/7/17)
How to know such expressions/statements(?)? (Clarification required; 2/7/17)
Changes In The-Conformations-A-Sound/Word-Represents (Definition?)| 28/6/17;20: Origin| From writing the conformations representation of “Exploration”; see 28/6/17;19. From the changes in definition I had known before in certain subjects.
Does the expressed conformations a sound/word represents change when experience for which the sound/word is used, mismatches with the expression? (Clarification required; 28/1/17; 20)
Complete Expression| 27/6/17;6: Nothing yet…
Difficulty In Particular Expression In Particular Languages| 27/6/17;5: Is it when we are not able to express the intended conformation, that we need new expression? (27/6/17; 5)
Precise Expression| 23/6/17;19: Experience| I was reading chemistry, and from certain source I came to know that the bond length between two (carbon?) atoms to be 1.4 Angstrom, and the diameter of (carbon?) atom to be 2.2 Angstroms. I drew the line of distance l.4, the one which is there near to the sentence written in the image, and drew an atom, as the distance between two atoms is 1.4, I thought the ending surface of the atom need to be shorter than the distance, so I drew the atom with ending curve shorter the 1.4 Angstrom distance. For the second atom, I saw that the distance between two atomic centers to be 1.4, but the radius of the atom to be only 1.1 Angstroms, then again I drew the curve of the atom shorter than the distance between them. Later due to certain thought (related to covalent bond?), I started thinking it to be wrong. Later I drew the diagram by using scale, the one with two atoms at the bottom of the image below, then I saw that two curves intersect each other. Before while thinking due to imprecise representation, I had come to wrong conclusion. (23/6/17; 19)
Thought| Does precise expression eliminate wrong conclusions? | How? (24/6/17; 2 | 27/6/17; 1)
Choosing Words/Sounds| 19/6/17: Experience| I am using the word “allow” in certain sentences where I was using “helps”. Expected Exploration: Why am I tending to use “allow”? (19/6/17)
Reality Expression Vs. Metaphor Expression| 18/6/17: Nothing yet…
Seeing The Need Of Every Word| 24/6/17;1: Nothing yet…
Need Of Using The Word Seems| 18/6/17: Doesn’t that allow seeing other possibilities in every exploration? (Clarification required, 18/6/17)
Utility: To not forget the notion;
Imprecise Expression Consequences And Precise Expression Consequences| 12/6/17: Nothing yet…
Solidity Of Notion Before And After Giving A Sound/Word (Expression/Name)| 3/5/17: Clarification required; Nothing yet…
Appearance| 15/4/17: Experience| I felt (?) a difference in appearance of the same content in the default PDF viewer of my phone (Google PDF viewer?) and that in XODO Docs. There are black gaps in the default viewer and white patches in XODO. I felt ease with XODO (?) (Expecting notion solidity; Clarification required; 15/4/17)
Context-Lossless Expression| 13/4/17: I seem to be using the context of thought or the support of thoughts in the group, for expression. Is it not possible to make each expression stand independently? (13/4/17)
Construction Principles Behind Symbols, Paintings And Detailed Expressive Language Symbols| 30/3/17: Nothing yet…
Links: Optimal expression for automation of exploration (?);
Representation:
Incompleteness In The Representation/Expression Of Reality Via Language| 5/2/17: Experience (E)| I was reading the article “Board Games Reconsidered”, where the author was trying to explain the rules of Mancala game, which was looking bit incomplete (clarification required) in expressing the action of reality without pre-experience on the game.
In the websites, links are colored without sometimes indicating them to be clicked for information, and this seems to be assumed to be known by the user. Isn’t this an incomplete expression/representation?
Complete Representation/Expression Via Language| 7/2/17: Nothing yet…
Representation Of Notion| 16/1/17: Experience (E)| I have seen that I usually forget the notion which my words represent, often those written in short form while being outside home. (16/1/17)
[Gen] Direct Original Expression Vs. Expression Of The Original Using Language/Signs| 15/2/17: Exploration Notion| In college, sounds are used to represent the real world objects [?-better expression is required] in spite of having the image representations (videos) or direct primary source, which one is trying to express. Sounds seems to compress the reality as like the names of thought groups here, which upon seeing seems to help in knowing the explored entire previous-thoughts. Think more on this. (15/2/17)
[Gen] Optimal Expression/Representation| 15/2/17: Experience (E) | I was naming thought groups before, as like now here for this group being given "Symbols" as the name; but for few groups I didn't give any names, I saw the long time taken in going through those thought groups, as I didn't have any hint on their nature unless I read through them, on the other hand, thought groups with names were more easy to go through, as they hinted on what they were in their names.
Thought (T) | Does overview nature of symbols (due to their compactness), allow them to have greater flexibility and greater ease to reach higher exploratory levels?
Symbols and compact sounds seem to be meant only for ease of exploration for an explorer who had experienced its inner structures, but they seem not for a beginner, as this might bring difficulty instead of ease, because of they trying to first understand them. (updated on 15/2/17)
[Gen] Optimal Expression/Representation| 15/2/17: Experience (E) | I was naming thought groups before, as like now here for this group being given "Symbols" as the name; but for few groups I didn't give any names, I saw the long time taken in going through those thought groups, as I didn't have any hint on their nature unless I read through them, on the other hand, thought groups with names were more easy to go through, as they hinted on what they were in their names.
Thought (T) | Does overview nature of symbols (due to their compactness), allow them to have greater flexibility and greater ease to reach higher exploratory levels?
Symbols and compact sounds seem to be meant only for ease of exploration for an explorer who had experienced its inner structures, but they seem not for a beginner, as this might bring difficulty instead of ease, because of they trying to first understand them. (updated on 15/2/17)
[Gen] Is compression optimal for the explorer (the one who wants to explore more after having known the compressed form) to have an overview? And is it not optimal for the beginner who can’t doesn’t know properly, the contents of the compressed form? (15/2/17)
Favoring But-Not-Favorable Expression| 15/1/17: Nothing yet...
Real Time Expression | 15/1/17: Experience Notion (EN) | I have noticed that, in the most of the conversations I speak thoughts which I have already constructed.
Thoughts (T) | When can one achieve real-time thought construction? (B11P157, 15/1/17)
Thoughts (T) | When can one achieve real-time thought construction? (B11P157, 15/1/17)
Rhythm And Grammar| 16/1/17: Does rhythm tries to compensate the error in grammatical construction of the statement? (16/1/17)
Wrong Expression:
Wrong Expression:
Out-Of-Sync Expressions: Experience: I was not understanding the relevance of word “limit” in calculus: “limit tending to 0”. There may be a relevance, which I may see later. But, I am sensing a situation where expression may be not expressing what it meant to express.
If there are such cases, what can be the reason for that? (15/4/17)
Does the used sound/word has similarities with the sound/word representing the actual conformation? (16/4/17)
Links: Meaning of exploratory way going out of sync;
Exaggerated/Misnomer Expression| 21/1/17: Experience (E)| I was coming back to home from college, there were my four friends in the bus, one of my friend asked on what I was discussing with one of my teacher, I said on me to had discussed on "order of knowledge" with him, suddenly one of my friend made an expression through his face of something being awkward (?); on asking about his expression, he said to have been thinking about some other matter, and he signed on being not meant anything with regard to what I spoke. I don't know whether he was genuine in saying that or not, but I have another similar example for the use of words "understand the whole universe", from my discussion in PF:
If there are such cases, what can be the reason for that? (15/4/17)
Does the used sound/word has similarities with the sound/word representing the actual conformation? (16/4/17)
Links: Meaning of exploratory way going out of sync;
Exaggerated/Misnomer Expression| 21/1/17: Experience (E)| I was coming back to home from college, there were my four friends in the bus, one of my friend asked on what I was discussing with one of my teacher, I said on me to had discussed on "order of knowledge" with him, suddenly one of my friend made an expression through his face of something being awkward (?); on asking about his expression, he said to have been thinking about some other matter, and he signed on being not meant anything with regard to what I spoke. I don't know whether he was genuine in saying that or not, but I have another similar example for the use of words "understand the whole universe", from my discussion in PF:
Stepping back: aren't you just asking what the best way to study is?
My advice is to forget this whole "understand the whole universe" thing.
Even here I am not sure for the above kind of expression being caused by my expression kind. (21/1/17)
Complete Notion Expression| 22/1/17: I seem to be not expressing my complete notion due to deficiency of getting the right structural sentence, I need to eliminate this drive and compete expressing my notion. (22/1/17)
Reading The Expression| 2/2/17: When one is reading the words or hearing the sounds of a language, does he/she consciously or voluntarily match with the pictures to which the words/sounds correspond? Or how does one process the language expressions? (< 2/2/17)
Experience Friendly Thought Vs. Syntax Friendly Thought| 03/11/16: We seem to frame sentences by not stressing on the clear precise expression of experience, but on the ease of exploring from the available language words which come into us swiftly for the expression of experience. (03/11/16)Most of the syntax friendly thoughts seems to be not completely trust worthy, in their word to word resolution test. (03/11/16)
Try adding the badge or notification"Verified Experience Friendly Language (EFL)", in every group of thoughts to ensure the quality. Try bringing more categories of this kind. (03/11/16)
Evolution Of Standard Syntax/Ready-Made Thought Suits| 18/2/17: Do syntax act as ready to use suits for the expression of reality, without any need to transfer the reality into their corresponding precise language sounds/words? (19/2/17)
Is the use of syntax proportional to imprecise expression of the reality? (19/2/17)
Comments
Post a Comment