I seem to have exploratory way word for two meanings: Structure which is seen in one case, and which has been explored in the other, where it may or may not be present;
Credits of notions: Cathy Cobb and Harold Goldwhite’s "Creations Of Fire: Chemistry's Lively History From Alchemy To The Atomic Age"; A History of Optics from Greek Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century; Tobias Dantzig’s “Numbers”;
How to know conformations without having exploratory way| 23/6/17;15: Nothing yet…
Utility: Might allow knowing the unknown; Unknown ease/need?
Exploration Without Exploratory Ways (?)| 14/6/17: Aren’t conformations needed to explore? If there are no conformations, is it possible to explore? (14/6/17)
Exploration Site| 15/6/17: If everyone has different exploratory ways, is it possible to find create different exploration by inducing different exploratory mechanism of different humans? (Clarification required, 15/6/17)
Law Of Conservation Of Exploration| 11/5/17: Nothing yet…
Thought Not Intended To Be Thought| < 28/4/17: I seem to make thought explorations which I don’t mean. (Clarification required, 29/4/17)
Do these thoughts come from the experiences we had? (Clarification required, 28/4/17)
Merging Of Not-Intended Thought As The Expressed Thought| 29/4/17: Nothing yet…
Search For The Existence Of Same Structure In Other Contexts| 2/4/17: Is exploratory way the structure’s presence exploration in one context from the experience of its presence in other context? (2/4/17)
Experience| I saw a lizard which had got shock from going into holes of the plug, trying to find a place to hide from humans (?; even if it is not the case, let us consider a situation of any animal trying to do that), it didn’t have the overview of the room in which it was in. The room had only one rack, below which it could have hidden. If the lizard, due to deficiency of overview, takes the wrong path, it may not reach the rack. But, if it can climb up and have an overview, it can choose the optimal path. Here there is a structure of climbing up to have an overview; I have now got stuck in not knowing the complete rules of this world, I don’t know whether I am choosing the optimal path or not, or whether there are problems with my steps, is there a structure in my context, on which I can climb up to see the rules? Isn’t here, the structure on which I want to climb, an exploratory way, whose existence I don’t know, but which I am searching from the experience of that structure in other context? (2/4/17)
Links: Element as the exploratory way (present exploration seems to have origins from this exploration); Game as the exploratory way; Need as the exploratory way; Purpose as the exploratory way; Problem as the exploratory way; Puzzle as the exploratory way; Mass and time as the exploratory way; Rationality as an exploratory way;
Does exploratory way represent the same what others call as “concepts”? (2/4/17)
Are exploratory ways artificial structures (if the same structure is not present in the other context)? Don’t these bring automation? (2/4/17)
Is it optimal to use exploratory ways? Aren’t they giving more ways to explore? (2/4/17)
Links: Analogies (above exploration construction seems to have origins from this exploration; this structure of writing exploratory principles has its origin in my exploration behind principles of exploration construction);
Why were we before assuming the structures existence in other domains? Were we not conscious? (Clarification required, 3/4/17)
Real Exploratory Ways And Artificial Exploratory Ways| 3/4/17: Nothing yet…
Use Of Artificial Exploratory Ways In Decisions/Thinking/Arguments(?)| 4/3/17: Doesn’t the use of not existing exploratory way lead to deception in giving wrong conclusion? | Is it by introducing not existing structures? (Clarification required, 4/3/17 | 14/6/17)
I met my teacher to say on why I had decided to not read college portions, because of not having solved math problem (on infinitesimals) which needs to be understood before other compound subjects (is it?). Ma’am asked me to adapt to the college situation, but here “adapt” seems to be an exploratory-way/analogy, by adapting here in this situation might lead me to problems which I need to explore (dissolution of certain defects in the learnt subject—clarification required). Instead of adapting, we may need to modify the college way of giving data, viz. we may give data to students only when their components are free of problems. Is adaption a conformation valid to be explored here--it may be in certain cases, but will it also be in other cases? Are these exploratory ways which are induced from other cases bringing bias in decisions? (< 22/4/17)
Giving Existence For The Artificial Exploratory Way| 5/4/17: Nothing yet…
Degree Of New Exploration Ways From The Other New Exploratory Ways| 26/3/17: Nothing yet..
Small Exploratory Way Blocking The Big Exploratory Way| < 26/3/17: Nothing yet…
To Eye/Transparent Only When Explored| 15/3/17: Nothing yet…
Yucky Exploratory Ways| 11/2/17: See B11P167. Nothing yet…
Links: Artificial exploratory way;
[Gen] Higher Exploratory Model| Depth limitation of any niche might be conceived by the existence of other model's depth (Is that the case?). Similarly, conceiving anything seems to have limitation based on the existence of a model with a certain intensity. According to this there is no limitation for anything except the deficiency of exploratory models? (B5P70, 26/07/2016, Logical Possibility/Intuition)
According to the above possibility, nothing can be taken beyond a certain intensity or saturation point, as there can exist no model beyond a certain intensity, because of everything getting to the same intensity level, thus leading to the existence of no model. It seems that model need not be of higher intensity, even the small developing model may contribute to the progress of any other niche by the virtue of its properties. (B5P70, 26/07/2016, Logical Possibility/Intuition)
Experience (E) | I didn't know what is going to be there to say about topic like "Origins of Concepts"; I seem to have had relative false notion of shallow depth in that topic, where Susan Carey has shown the depth by her book on the topic. (18/09/2016)
Thought (T) | We seem to have shallow depth conception in anything without much data; it seems better to avoid such notions and consider the depth possibility. Is this shallow conception a result of not having seen a higher exploratory model? (18/09/2016)
Some of them seems to remain satisfied with their reasoning without knowing their no-depth of reasoning--facile. This applies to me also, I need to create a measure of deepness of reasoning. Can this be due to not having seen a model of higher depth reasoning? (31/05/2016)
Construction Of Higher Exploratory Model| 13/2/17: [Gen] How to construct higher exploratory models?
Bigger Exploratory Ways| a. Is a bigger exploratory system (containing sequence of exploratory ways?) not helpful? Won't it help me see through all the exploratory ways? (Clarification required)
b. Won't seeing through all the exploratory ways take lot of time, by seeing through the ways in which the considered case doesn't fit to be explored?
What if it is not possible at all to eliminate the not-needed explorations? Should I first see the sample? What if you were seeing only the difficult side? Or is there any way to know about the impossibility? (B11P90, 13/11/16)
c. At least it doesn't make me blind to certain cases, right? (13/11/16)
Being Blind without Exploratory Way| There is something of unusual nature in my notion of one not being able to explore, without being aware of exploratory ways. Think more on this.
Vector Calculus of Exploration| Should I now have experience on making explorations in different directions? (06/11/16)
No Exploratory Way: Are Stuck Now?| Do we get trapped in some of the situations by not having the right exploratory ways? (B[ook]11P[age]78, 31/10/16)
Exploratory Ways | <15/08/2016: Are exploratory ways helping to explore via other known ways found in other cases? (Clarification required, 6/6/17)
Are there any other effective system for exploring via other known conformations? (Clarification required, 7/6/17)
Are we trying to explain reality by the ways we know, for we not knowing the reality? (Clarification required, connected with the book “Chemistry’s lively history”, 6/6/17)
What if there is no alternative for the real parts we are trying to explore or have experience on? (Clarification required, 6/6/17)
Supports: Bohr model using circles for representing atoms.
Does new way of expression give new ways of exploration? (Clarification required, 9/3/17)
If not-experience (not-pud) evolved structure assumes its presence due to the exploration possibility allowed by the exploratory way (example: symbols of decimal notation—clarification required), doesn’t every other possibility has the same chance of having existence? (Clarification required, 9/3/17)
What is the difference between the possibility suggested by exploratory way and that of any other possibility? Doesn’t the possibility coming from exploratory way, has the support of analogical or synchronizing exploration due to it? (Clarification required, 9/3/17)
Symbol = An Exploratory Way? Why? (9/3/17)
Thought (T)| Converse thinking can be added to exploratory way category. (B[ook]6P[age]33, 15/08/2016)
Think on discovering new exploratory ways like When, Which, Why.., which seem to represent no actions in reality but a communication asking for a kind of exploration from other human (<26/11/16)
[Gen] Intense Act | 13/1/17: Why is not thinking or intellectual activity showing out (or has not evolvedーhas it?) as an intense conformation than other acts like sex, singing and dancing? (13/1/17)
The most "intense" experience like that of any cricket match, movie, etc., seems to have many general properties, which are used often in other situations for exploration via metaphors. Chess being a game with many of its conformations formed by its allowed movements, gives many general conformations, which can be used to explore the same possibility or notice the same conformation in other situations. (30/10/2016)
Thought (T)| We need to search out the sounds which ease the exploration. Do you remember Darwin saying on this, for his use of word "Natural Selection"?
Supports (S)| See Darwin's Origin of Species: "Everyone knows what is meant and is implied by such metaphorical expression; and they are almost necessary for brevity." (28/05/2016)
T| The more one is inclined towards a concept, the more it seems he/she will be inclined to search for possibilities of that idea in every other niche, like using the idea of swift in the niche of learning or using the ideas of Sherlock Holmes novel into detective learning of any subject. (27/05/2016)
S| From The New Oxford American Dictionary, idea: a thought or suggestion as to a possible course of action. (B5P29, 24/07/2016)
From Wikipedia--Idea: "The word idea comes from Greek ἰδέα idea "form, pattern," from the root of ἰδεῖν idein, "to see."" (03/09/2016)
The true reason seems to be always discoverable and seem to be not the one which should be made to fit into. (30/05/2016)
Questions seems to be major exploratory thoughts. (31/05/2016)
It seems we are not aware of many things, which are in front of our eyes. (01/06/2016)
We should pass the problem subject through each and every possible exploratory ways to choose the best optimized path. (01/07/2016)
Think on qualifications for a maturity level/experiences needed for a human to discover anything from a given set of data. (B5P80, 03/07/2016)
T| Exploratory ways seems to suggest only the logical possibility but doesn't seem to guarantee its affect in reality. (B5P76, 03/07/2016)
S| From The New Oxford American Dictionary, idea: (in Platonic thought) an externally existing pattern of which individual things in any class are imperfect copies. (in Kantian thought) a concept of pure reason, not empirically based in experience. (B5P29, 24/07/2016)
We need to create a algorithmic way of applying strategies and tactics from simple to complex level (according to the situation)--as some may not require complex exploratory view/conditions, because of the most factors of complex being not much effective)-- after seeing the best exploratory fit for the situation. (B6P29, 07/07/2016, Intuition)
Find the structure/elements of exploratory ways, then try creating the math/algebra, which will help in using algorithmically the complete power of analogies' exploratory power and thus in the creation of powerful math human language. (B6P29, 07/07/2016, Intuition)
There seems to exist two types of exploratory ways: A. Elemental exploratory ways, B. Compound exploratory ways. (B6P30, 07/07/2016, Intuition)
What determines the effectiveness of a exploratory way in reality? (08/07/2016, Exploratory)
If it seems of high resistance to achieve something from a particular view, try using different view, without eliminating the other. Paraphrasing may change things completely. (B6P31, 10/07/2016, Exploratory)
From Wikipedia: Idea, "..In Goethean Science (1883), he[Rudolf Steiner] declares, "Thinking ... is no more and no less an organ of perception than the eye or ear. Just as the eye perceives colors and the ear sounds, so thinking perceives ideas."...";
Can we make thinking automated by founding a math of exploratory ways or ideas? (26/07/2016)
Are all the sound representations (i.e. words of a language) itself perceived exploratory ways? (04/09/2016)
From Wikipedia: Fallibilism: "Fallibilism (from Medieval Latin: fallibilis, "liable to err") is the philosophical principle that human beings could be wrong about their beliefs, expectations, or their understanding of the world." Here we can include exploratory ways with beliefs, expectation, etc.
E| Vasanth has a notion of converse nature, "if you go at depth in one subject, you will be missing out the depth in another". Should this notion be explored more? (04/09/2016)
T| We seems to have exploratory ways, which seems to determine our actions; we need to find a way to explore our notions at depth. (04/09/2016)
This notion seems to not apply at least in the context, where knowledge of one at depth provides elements to know others too at greater depth. I don’t know where Vasanth’s notion applies. (13/2/17)
While choosing the course PCMC (Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Computer Science) in my Pre-University phase, I had explored certain reasons; I had chosen PCMC to have knowledge in Computer Science, which can't be read with minimum accessories as like Biology (?). But, I might not have explored in all the ways, at the end, one might not know what the result would turn on to; however, one would be aware of the exploratory way by which one chose something, and might work for that factor to raise greater contribution. (05/09/2016)
Mathematics seems to be an exploratory subject. (05/09/2016)
Doctor's remark--on my statement of Osteomyelitis disease having chances of recurring back even after he having made me take tablets beyond period for safer side--that every chances to exist only in my head, seems to highlight on exploratory way not matching the reality. (08/09/2016)
From Moskowitz's Go Nation: "A gentlemen should first consider things from all side...One should pay attention to every aspect of everything one does in order not be trapped in a dangerous situation". These statements represent the nature of Exploratory math language, we are trying to build. (09/09/2016)
It seems difficult to express some of the new exploratory ways/conformations/experiences from the existing words of a language, only they seem to be in need of name, and all other ways seem possible to be expressed. (Clarification via example required, 10/09/2016)
Language seems to preserve conformation experiences, which are noticed and/or recurred most of the time. Then, every language seems to have a set experiences which the other might not have, depending on the community experience. (10/09/2016)
[Gen] Is it that the general (which recur allot) conformations which are not represented/named/noticed, can be called as the unnamed/unexplored exploratory ways? Are these the ways which can be obtained from Chess and Go game which have their own experience fields? (11/09/2016)
It seems that language used now is an uncompleted experience/exploratory way deficient system. (11/09/2016)
Logical movement restricted games like Chess and Go, seems to produce recurring conformations/structures, which are unique but not all seems to get named, because of them not being generally seen in other practical life movements. We should bring game movement sensitivity exploratory frame for the real practical life world. [Gen] If there is no such logical movement field for reality, I can try inducing an artificial one, as like in number line, where artificial standards can be induced in the place of non-existing elements (?). (11/09/2016)
E| Vinay B.S showed the relations $$\tan 89 = 57.28; \tan 89.9 = 572.9; \tan 89.99 = 5729.57; \tan 90 = \infty$$; these conformations or experience seems to express the sensitivity of minute steps. When the expression of such a notion is not possible with words, in some cases, we seem to use analogies to express it. (06/09/2016)
T| Analogies seems to express the unrepresented/unnamed notions or exploratory ways. (06/09/2016)
When exploratory way has not been given a name, we seem to express it using analogies. (06/09/2016)
Go and Chess seems to have potential to introduce notions which one had not experienced.
Try giving pattern expressing names for the new exploratory ways. (06/09/2016)
If there is a way out connecting Go with all other general conformations, then think on the possibility of connecting the outside conformations with Go, to explore EWs. (01/10/2016)
From David Shenk's The Immortal Game: A History of Chess
These statements illustrate on our inability to explore the "intangible" world without exploratory ways--"metaphor". Can't we really explore without exploratory ways or metaphors or ideas? (02/10/2016?)
It seems that we should keep everything as a variant. instead of assuming it to be prototype. [Gen] We should create algorithm to make exploration in every variation at point of thought. (<30/10/16)
See 12.18 of Does every move associates with it a problem?
Comments
Post a Comment