Skip to main content

Can Decision Be Made Without Having Complete Experience?

Optimal Algorithm To Make Optimal Decision| 19/7/17;17: Nothing yet… 

Ignorant Decision| 29/6/17;1: I seem to be not having all the experience; without having complete experience, can my decisions be correct now? See 30/6/17; 25. (29/6/17; 1)
Won’t I need only elementary experiences to know all the compound experiences for making decisions? See 10/7/17; 11a. (10/7/17; 15b)
Expected Exploration: Correct decision Vs. Optimal decision
Does ignorance of certain conformations change the decision (an action chosen among many other for attaining the desired utility in an optimal (least time) way?)? (30/6/17; 22)
Is it not possible that the conformation not known, to be the one, which would have allowed to attain the utility at least time? (30/6/17; 25)
Is it required that to make correct decisions, that I have all the experience? Do I now then, need to know all the conformations before making any other decision? (29/6/17; 2)
Can my present decision (an action chosen among other for attaining the desired utility in an optimal (least time) way?) of knowing all the other conformations before making any other decision, be itself not optimal? (30/6/17; 26)
[To be answered] When could this decision (see 30/6/17; 26) be not optimal? Is this action of knowing all the other conformations before choosing actions for the attainment of desired utility, be not optimal, if there are only certain non-complete conformations (experiences) which only can allow attaining utility in an optimal (least time) way than that from knowing all the conformations?   (30/6/17; 27)

Is it optimal (of ease to attain utility in least time) to choose the optimal action among the known actions, for attaining the utility in an an optimal way, and then change it if other optimal actions are known? (2/7/17)
Can’t the action later known for the attainment of utility in least time make the all other past actions not needed? (2/7/17)
When would all the past actions be not needed? (2/7/17)

How to know all the experiences allowing to attain utility at least time? (2/7/17)
Which experiences will allow attaining utility in least time? (2/7/17)
Is it required that I have all the experience for attaining utility in an optimal way? (30/6/17; 29)
Can’t there be experience which would not change decision (action chosen among many to attain the utility in an optimal (least time) way?)? (30/6/17; 30)
When would an experience (conformation) not change the decision (action chosen among many other to attain the utility in an optimal (least time) way?)? (30/6/17; 31)
I am now seeing the portable charger which is there near me (an experience), would this change my desired utility of making an optimal decision of what we need to do here?
Could the use of this experience depend on different persons? How? Isn't there a difference in a person knowing the working of charger seeing it and a lay-person seeing it?
Isn’t experience the same, i.e. what he/she senses through sense organs, the same? (1/7/17; 5)
Can the desired utility change with the knowing of all the experiences? (30/6/17; 28)
Could there be experiences which would not change the decision? (1/7/17; 4)
Experience: The climate was too cold yesterday, so I decided to take bath in hot water. | Thought: Is decision an action selected among other actions for attaining the desired utility or conformation in an optimal way? (29/6/17; 16)
What if I hadn’t explored on decision conformation, can I attain utility without knowing it? Could there be such other conformations? (Clarification required; 30/6/17; 24)
Won’t I need to know/have only elements experience, as all the other compound structures can be known without experiencing them? (Clarification required; 9/7/17; 23)
What is the difference between knowing and experiencing? (9/7/17; 24)
Is there a difference between knowing and experiencing? (10/7/17; 4)
It seems that optimal move at every stage of Nim board game is known in $N \times N$ (infinite sized?) board without having experience of all the board arrangements/conformations. See: https://boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/36798/is-there-a-closed-solved-game-with-infinite-possible-board-arranments. (10/7/17; 1)
What is the difference in knowing and experiencing a Nim board arrangement? (10/7/17; 2)
Is there a difference between knowing and experiencing a Nim board arrangement? | Isn’t experiencing itself a way of knowing conformations/actions? (10/7/17; 3| 11b)
On experiencing a board arrangement by playing on the board, won’t I be knowing the board arrangement? (10/7/17; 7)
Is experiencing, the knowing of board arrangements from sense organs (eyes)? (10/7/17; 8)
Can conformations be known with and without sense organs? (10/7/17; 9)
How can conformations be known without sense organs? | I seem to be knowing elementary experiences from sense organs. (10/7/17; 10| 11c)
Can elementary experiences be known without sense organs? (10/7/17; 12)
Can elementary experiences be known from compound elements? (10/7/17; 13)
Can compound elements be known from sense organs? (10/7/17; 14)
If compound elements can be known from sense organs, and if they can allow knowing elementary experiences, won’t we be knowing elementary experience without direct use of sense organs?(Clarification required, 10/7/17; 15a)
In Nim game, different board arrangements seem to be known without seeing them. Can all the other board arrangements (compound experience?) be known without sense-organs/eyes, if elementary conformations (or elementary experience?) making different arrangements are known through eyes/sense-organs? (10/7/17; 11a)
Can my choosing of action to know all the elementary experiences to know compound experiences, for making optimal decision (action made to attain utility in least time?) be not optimal, as I don’t know all the elementary and compound experiences? (11/7/17; 1)
Are compound experiences needed (allowing to attain utility in least time?) to make optimal decision? (11/7/17; 2)

Is the program (alpha go?) able to take optimal decision at every move of the go game? (Clarification required; 9/7/17; 25)

Could there be other thoughts which may be against my actions? (2/7/17)
How to know all the thoughts against my actions? (2/7/17)
Is it optimal to know them now? (2/7/17)
Links: Clash of theories?; Creations Of Fire Book;
Do I need to write the representative sound of the above thought group to allow the ease of finding it, without seeing the entire thoughts? Is this action going to allow attaining utility at least time than other actions? (Clarification required, 2/7/17)
Do I need to write it only when it is used? (2/7/17)
 
Is it optimal to explore on ignorant decision after optimizing the exploration? (11/7/17; 3)
In certain cases, won’t the optimal decision for the time be not optimal for a long term?; (11/7/17; 4)
How to know optimal decisions of all time? Won’t I need to know complete working of the world to make optimal decisions of all time? (Clarification required, 11/7/17; 5)
Is my action optimal according to the data known to me? (Clarification required, 11/7/17; 6)
Can optimal actions according to my data be not optimal according to complete data? (11/7/17; 7)
How to make optimal decisions without knowing complete data? (11/7/17; 8)
Can’t these decisions be said to others who know more data, to see if the decision stays optimal according to them? (11/7/17; 9)
Is it optimal (attain desired utility in least time) to know the exploration (expressions of conformations to know conformations?) ways now, to completely explore from the existing data? (Clarification required, 11/7/17; 10)
Expected Exploration: No-evolution on decision being optimal of all time| Notion credits: Vinay B.S.;
If one’s desired utility is to reach another place in least time, then the optimal action of all time, may be to move at fastest speed possible in the world; but do we know the conformation which can allow to attain the fastest speed? Can the optimal decisions exist according to known data, but could there be no conformations allowing that decision/action? (Clarification required; 11/7/17; 14)
How to know on whether the decision, optimal according to the incomplete data, as optimal according to complete data or not? (11/7/17; 15)
Am I not waiting now for knowing on optimal decision via any of the present exploration? Won’t I also be waiting even if I am trying to know all the elemental experience, to know the optimal decision? (Clarification required; 12/7/17; 8)
Are you saying that I need to not take any decision till I know all the data? (Clarification required; 12/7/17; 9)
Can this present decision of knowing all the data be itself not optimal? Do I then need to see whether this decision stays optimal with increase in data? (Clarification required; 12/7/17; 10)
Can I take decisions (choose actions among all the other to attain the utility in least time) to know all the data? (12/7/17; 11)
Do I now need to know other exploratory ways than atom, for knowing other ways of knowing all the data? (Clarification required; 12/7/17; 12)

Optimality Of Chosen Action| 18/7/17;1: Is it optimal to make action optimal to the extent of allowing the attainment of utility? (Clarification required; 18/7/17; 1)

Elements Of All The Exploratory Ways| 13/7/17; 1: Nothing yet…
Till I know all the data, won’t my actions be non-optimized by the not-known conformations? (Clarification required; 13/7/17; 2)
Can’t the actions be optimized after knowing all the data? (13/7/17; 4)
Are there actions whose non-optimization can’t be undone after doing them? (Clarification required; 13/7/17; 5)
What if I have got stuck from not-known data? (Clarification required; 13/7/17; 6)
What is stucking here? Is stucking the conformation of increase in time to attain desired utility? (Clarification required; 13/7/17; 7)

Wrong Conclusions Via Half Experience/Incomplete Exploration| 14/3/17: My teacher said on imposing discipline. She had experience in a country where police don’t patrol for a month, when this was the case, people were said to have made the place dirty. When the police were there, the place seems to have been clean. Using this experience, she concluded that imposing discipline to be necessary. This was said to make us all sit in the class. Ma’am allowed us to leave class after taking attendance, and made only those who wanted to sit, sit in the class. But, on 14th she gave above argument for the justification of making us all sit in the class. (14/3/17) 
If our final target matches with the track we have chosen, won’t the progress be automatic, without any imposition of needed task for the attainment of it? For a spontaneous reaction, there is no need of giving energy for making the reaction to happen, but we might need to impose conditions to make it not happen, similarly we can say about non-spontaneous reactions. (14/3/17)
I don’t know what is right here. But, I am seeing a possibility of conclusion being wrong without complete experience/exploration (even if it is/if it is not the case here with the teacher). (14/3/17)
How to know whether we are victim of such wrong conclusions or not? (14/3/17; edited on 29/6/17)

Microscopic No-Complete Reasoned Decisions| 12/3/17: I seem to be not reasoning completely for my action at microscopic level (?). (Clarification required, 12/3/17)
Experience| I was searching for sources on “Automated Thinking/Exploration“, I found a book “Conceptual Exploration”. It contained words which I didn’t understand (example: attribute exploration), I closed the tab containing it without any further reasoning. (Clarification required, 12/3/17)
I deleted an app by seeing it crash upon immediately after its installation, I deleted it without exploring it. (Clarification required, 12/3/17)

Refreshing Decision| < 22/1/17: What about polishing my decision again and again everyday, instead of taking decisions and then leaving it there? I should refresh and recheck my plans everyday, with my new experiences. (B11P85, 07/11/16)
 
Short Exploratory Decision| 21/1/17: Experience Notion (EN)| It seems that my sister is making decisions without completely exploring the situation. (22/1/17)
Thought (T)| It seems that we push only one principle as the basis of our decision instead of basing on the optimal principle of many principles acting on the context. (22/1/17)

Optimal Decision Provider With The Required Experiences| 19/1/17: Nothing yet... 
 
Transparent In-Depth Explored Clear Decisions | 14/08/2016: Nothing yet...

Decisions With Sampling | 04/08/2016:
Nothing yet...

Decision:
Some of the decisions seems to stand on the reasons which are not verified properly, which seem to make us choose the step which might not be the best one. (06/06/2016)
As like I have arrived at a particular decision on various things via different thoughts, others might have arrived at a decision via their one different thoughts...there is more to think on this. (05/11/16)
Your decision might go on changing with experience, but rate of change might decrease with increase in experience. (07/11/16)
Quantification might help in making a strong decision. (07/11/16)

Can't we ever take the right decision by always being ignorant of something? (31/10/16)
But math seems to say something as most exactly optimal one than any other choice--optimization. (31/10/16)
As our supporting stands go on increasing on a particular claim or decision, it seems to fix high probability of our decision or claim being the right one. (01/11/16)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog