Daughter branches of this section:
Automation Of Thinking/Exploration
Automation Of Thinking/Exploration
Exploration Directions?|19/7/17;20: Am I making the exploration from the possibilities allowed by expressions? (Clarification required; 19/7/17; 20)
Experience: In this below sentence with the ending 13, had I seem to now trying to… instead of the now present I seem to now need…., later after the change to “need”, I made the next exploration given below with the ending 18.
“I seem to now need to attain the utility of making optimal action of what we need to do here. (19/7/17; 13)
Is attaining the utility of making optimal action, a need? (19/7/17; 18)”
Don’t I need to make exploration from the needs I have? (Clarification required; 19/7/17; 21)
Completing The Exploration| 19/7/17;19: I seem to have been before leaving questions without answering them. Am I now completing the exploration or answering the questions? (19/7/17; 19)
Predicting Next Exploration| 17/7/17;4: Clarification required; Nothing yet.
Customization| 17/7/17;1: Do questions allow customization? (17/7/17; 1)
Exploration| 29/6/17;5: For what utility am I using compound-exploration (which requires elemental knowing of language evolution, etc.)? (Clarification required; 29/6/17; 5)
Is thought-exploration, the expressions of conformations, or the expressions (why, how; asking?) allowing to know conformations? (29/6/17; 8)
How do expressions of conformations allow knowing conformations? (11/7/17; 11a)
Do expressions of conformations allow knowing by making one see required data? (Clarification required; 11/7/17; 11b)
Can’t conformations be known without expressing? (Clarification required; 11/7/17; 12)
Is exploration not required if the required conformations (experience?) are (is) known? (Clarification required; 30/6/17; 23)
Is the present usage of compound thought-exploration, i.e. that which evolved, giving me the utility I need, without knowing its elementary evolution? (29/6/17; 9)
Am I using the compound utility for expressing the conformations, to know the optimal action for getting the desired main utility? (29/6/17; 10).
Is optimal action an action allowing to get the desired utility at least time? (29/6/17; 11)
Expected Exploration: What is time?;
Can the present thought exploration allow, to know the action to get desired utility of making optimal decision (an action chosen among many to attain the desired utility in an optimal (less time) way?)? (29/6/17; 15 | edited on 30/6/17)
Completing The Exploration| 19/7/17;19: I seem to have been before leaving questions without answering them. Am I now completing the exploration or answering the questions? (19/7/17; 19)
Predicting Next Exploration| 17/7/17;4: Clarification required; Nothing yet.
Customization| 17/7/17;1: Do questions allow customization? (17/7/17; 1)
Exploration| 29/6/17;5: For what utility am I using compound-exploration (which requires elemental knowing of language evolution, etc.)? (Clarification required; 29/6/17; 5)
Is thought-exploration, the expressions of conformations, or the expressions (why, how; asking?) allowing to know conformations? (29/6/17; 8)
How do expressions of conformations allow knowing conformations? (11/7/17; 11a)
Do expressions of conformations allow knowing by making one see required data? (Clarification required; 11/7/17; 11b)
Can’t conformations be known without expressing? (Clarification required; 11/7/17; 12)
Is exploration not required if the required conformations (experience?) are (is) known? (Clarification required; 30/6/17; 23)
Is the present usage of compound thought-exploration, i.e. that which evolved, giving me the utility I need, without knowing its elementary evolution? (29/6/17; 9)
Am I using the compound utility for expressing the conformations, to know the optimal action for getting the desired main utility? (29/6/17; 10).
Is optimal action an action allowing to get the desired utility at least time? (29/6/17; 11)
Expected Exploration: What is time?;
Can the present thought exploration allow, to know the action to get desired utility of making optimal decision (an action chosen among many to attain the desired utility in an optimal (less time) way?)? (29/6/17; 15 | edited on 30/6/17)
Is exploration the arrangement of conformations and knowing/searching(?) the resulting conformations from the had experience (simulation experiment?)? (Clarification required; 15/7/17; 12)
Changes In Exploration| 14/7/17;20: Won’t all the exploration change, on the changing of the conformations of what a sound/word represent? (14/7/17; 20)
Verifying The Definition (?)| 29/6/17;4: Nothing yet…
Faulty Exploration| 27/6/17;2: Experience| I was solving Linear Programming Problem: Maximize $z = 3x_1 + 5x_2$ subjected to conditions, $$x_1 + x_2 \le 5 ….(1)$$ $$x_1 - x_2 \le 4 ….(2)$$ $$x_1, x_2 \ge 0 ….(3)$$
This is what I wrote while solving this problem (with correction and addition): For this (above z) to be max, is it needed for $x_1$ and $x_2$ to be max? Yes. By adding equation $(1)$ and $(2)$, $x_1 \le 4.5$; by subtracting $(2)$ from $(1)$, $x_2 \le 0.5$. Then, by thinking, for $z$ to be max, $z = 3(4.5) + 5(0.5) = 16$.
By graph the value of $x_1$ and $x_2$ obtained were $0$ and $5$ respectively, and max $z$ was $25$.
Thought| I seem to have not verified my thoughts. I didn’t verify that I can’t subtract $(2)$ from $(1)$, as for subtracting, I need to multiply $(2)$ by $–1$, then $\le$ of $(2)$ becomes $\ge$, making the result valid only for case $=$. I might need to verify all my thoughts with all other thoughts. | Do I need to know the thought supporting the action to be right, for verifying it, on whether it supports in the considered case or not? Does knowing the supporting thought allow eliminating wrong conclusions? (Clarification required; B11P221; 27/6/17; 2 | 28/6/17; 9)
Do I need to make an action only after verifying the supporting thought? (Clarification required; 28/6/17; 17)
Do all the actions have supporting thought? (28/6/17; 18)
More Expected Exploration| Theorems, algorithm, not-acceptable conclusions and faults;
Changes In Exploration| 14/7/17;20: Won’t all the exploration change, on the changing of the conformations of what a sound/word represent? (14/7/17; 20)
Verifying The Definition (?)| 29/6/17;4: Nothing yet…
Faulty Exploration| 27/6/17;2: Experience| I was solving Linear Programming Problem: Maximize $z = 3x_1 + 5x_2$ subjected to conditions, $$x_1 + x_2 \le 5 ….(1)$$ $$x_1 - x_2 \le 4 ….(2)$$ $$x_1, x_2 \ge 0 ….(3)$$
This is what I wrote while solving this problem (with correction and addition): For this (above z) to be max, is it needed for $x_1$ and $x_2$ to be max? Yes. By adding equation $(1)$ and $(2)$, $x_1 \le 4.5$; by subtracting $(2)$ from $(1)$, $x_2 \le 0.5$. Then, by thinking, for $z$ to be max, $z = 3(4.5) + 5(0.5) = 16$.
By graph the value of $x_1$ and $x_2$ obtained were $0$ and $5$ respectively, and max $z$ was $25$.
Thought| I seem to have not verified my thoughts. I didn’t verify that I can’t subtract $(2)$ from $(1)$, as for subtracting, I need to multiply $(2)$ by $–1$, then $\le$ of $(2)$ becomes $\ge$, making the result valid only for case $=$. I might need to verify all my thoughts with all other thoughts. | Do I need to know the thought supporting the action to be right, for verifying it, on whether it supports in the considered case or not? Does knowing the supporting thought allow eliminating wrong conclusions? (Clarification required; B11P221; 27/6/17; 2 | 28/6/17; 9)
Do I need to make an action only after verifying the supporting thought? (Clarification required; 28/6/17; 17)
Do all the actions have supporting thought? (28/6/17; 18)
More Expected Exploration| Theorems, algorithm, not-acceptable conclusions and faults;
Crashing (?) Of Exploration Mechanism| 26/6/17;4: I seem to be not able to explore(?)--crashing(?), in mind for a long time, because of the need remembering back the previous thought (on requirement) and then continuing to think. (Clarification required; 12/7/17; 7)
Uniqueness Of Exploration| 23/6/17: Are explorations unique from the type of exploration used? (Clarification required; 23/6/17; 2)
Exploration Without Pressure| 20/6/17: Nothing yet…
Exploration Automated By Experience Conformation| 19/6/17: Experience| I had a pencil and a single looped hair, I was trying to pierce the pencil into the loop of the the hair. (19/6/17)
Utility: To hold the notion;
Exploration To The Threshold| 12/6/17: Nothing yet…
Identifying Conformations Giving Experience For Exploration| 12/6/17: Clarification required;
Multiple Same Exploration Arrival| 7/6/17: Are same experience conformations (or arrangements), their automated-exploratory-ways (example: a geometry instrument compass can give certain exploratory ways, it can have its one leg fixed and have its other rotated around, but it can’t give exploration of folding its leg itself easily(?)) and exploratory methods, the reason for same exploration arrival? (Clarification required, 7/6/17)
What made you explore in this way? Why do you think experience conformations, their exploratory ways and exploratory methods as the reason for same exploration arrival? (7/6/17)
Understanding| 6/6/17: Does understanding involve eliminating memory? (Clarification required, 6/6/17)
Crawling Depth| 6/6/17: I seem to have been exploring at longer length, and seems to have been seeing other possibilities. (Clarification required, 6/6/17)
Ease Case Than Understanding-Patterns| 6/6/17: Nothing yet; clarification required.
Greater Memory Length For Thinking| 8/7/17: Nothing yet…
Utility: Seems to help in finding optimal path of knowing elements. How is that going to help? (8/5/17) Science As The Search For Experience| 7/5/17: Isn’t most of the science (e.g. elementary particle physics, quantum mechanics) trying to know the experience from their reasoning? (7/5/17)
Does having experience on the element causing the conformation reduce scientific explanation via deductions? (Clarification required; 7/5/17)
If we come to experience on the exploratory way other than elements, won’t we get a completely different exploratory-way-element/new-exploration? (Clarification required; 7/5/17)
Is it optimal to find a device giving experience, instead of trying to know the experience via deductions which may or may not give accurate experience? Isn’t science looking like a simulation in certain cases, for knowing the real experience? (7/5/17)
Doesn’t science involve using the experience for creating new artificial experience? (8/5/17)
Evolution Of Scientific Explanation| 7/5/17: Is explanation, the knowing of element causing the conformation? (7/5/17)
Hidden Exploration Influence Link: Poincare’s “Science And Method”?;
Intentional Exploration And Non-Intentional Exploration| 3/5/17: Experience| I was walking back to home, then random thoughts came to me which I went on exploring, viz. I had thought about arranging thoughts according to their utility, from which I saw utility of certain groups as being them to be algorithms, which I could use as modules and execute them under different situations as being part of the another main big algorithm, this thought which came to me, made me think about the way of predicting structures at longer length, of which I don’t know the use of, or of which I didn’t intended to explore. (3/5/17)
Thought| Is it efficient to explore in such random way? (3/5/17)
Artificial Depth| 29/4/17: Nothing yet…
Flaw In Reasoning| < 29/4/17: Experience| I was reading Vector Spaces for my exam. In mathematics all the data will be clear, I thought on the proof I formed to be correct, but later I saw to have not considered factors, which were proving my proof to be wrong.
Thought| If I can get wrong in my reasoning by even having clear data, isn’t there chances of me being in other reasoning formed in non-mathematical domain? (29/4/17)
Knowing The Incomplete Identification Exploration| 16/4/17: Expecting solidity of notion; Clarification required;
Quality Of Exploration| 2/4/17: Notions: Exploration due to locked-bounds;
Experience| When I hear some of the expressions, I feel(?) to not hear them, as that might set as default conformation when not having reaction. (2/4/17)
What determines the quality of exploration? Is the quality determined on the correctness of exploration? (2/4/17)
Quick Clear Representation System| 31/3/17: Nothing yet…
Thinking| 31/3/17: Is thinking an application of exploration (identifications)? How? (31/3/17)
Exploration Drive: Representation of thinking;
Ahead Of Exploration| 27/3/17: Nothing yet…
Symbols Exploration Beyond The Language Exploration Of Human?| 17/3/17: Can symbols give more exploratory ways not thought by us from language? (Clarification required, 17/3/17)
Complete Reasoning Statements And Incomplete Reasoning Statements| 2/3/17: Nothing yet...
Control Of Images In Me While Thinking| 1/3/17: Random experiences (is it completely random? see if there is a rule behind them) seems to occur in me without control over them. Do I have no control over what should occur in me? (1/3/17)
Emergence Of Not-Needed Exploration Due To Not-Needed Data| 27/2/17: Nothing yet…
Conformations And Thoughts| 26/2/17: Experience Notion: Similar conformations seems to remind me certain thoughts. (Clarification required, 26/2/17)
If there are unique conformations, which may not recur again, need I note down the thoughts which come from them without waiting, to avoid the loss of them, as the same conformations may not be seen again to get back those thoughts; can’t memory help here? (Clarification required, 27/2/17 | edited on 12/7/17;12)
Data Exploration| 19/2/17: Different Ways of Arriving at the Same Concept: Notion Credits: Chethan (<25/07/2016)
APJ Sir spoke on Manjul Barghava to have invented his own proofs for the concepts of mathematics. (06/08/2016)
Recurred Exploration| 19/2/17: Using others data might help me, but it might come with other data which I don’t want. (Clarification required, 19/2/17)
Isn’t the exploration of the past explored necessary? If we don’t explore it, how can we even build it? Even if we go at depth in the areas explored in the past, won’t we get general elements which could be used in other domains? (Clarification required, 19/2/17)
Experiences| Vinay B.S. was saying on the use of the exploration done by others to save time. Rabbi Sir said on not exploring the same path which the past explorers have explored, but instead to explore the new areas. (< 19/2/17)
Least Memory Thought System| 13/2/17: Nothing yet…
Transparent Edge Work For Collaborative Building| 2/2/17: Nothing yet...
Complete Experience Attached Reasoning Base System| 28/1/17: Think on creating strong reasons with strong attached evidence/experience. Think also on categorizing from strong to weak reasoning bases, to allow greater solidifying of weak ones. (28/1/17)
Against/Beyond Reasoning| < 28/1/17: Nothing yet...
Reason Friendly System| 26/1/17: Experience (E)| I thought on understanding the origins of every concept I study, but college seems to be moving fast in teaching them. My reasoning of studying concepts deeply seems to be not fitting here in this system, because of time constraint. Shouldn't there be any bonus-kind feature for me? I may not be able to maintain the time properly, or I may not have studied concepts before itself. But, this context, even if it is false in my case, might give a notion of reason-friendly system. (26/1/17)
Stuck| 26/1/17: When you are stuck, try reverting back to the simplest case (with less problems, to enable detection of all the problem elements in the order of difficulty), go slow depending on the context. (26/1/17)
Continuation Of Default Conformations Due To Deficient Thinking Exploration| 24/1/17: Nothing yet...
Blocking Of Processing| < 22/1/17: Experience Notion (EN)| Sometimes I fail to process what others are trying to say. (23/1/117)
Consequences Of Weirdness| < 22/1/17: Notion Origins (NO)| I was always thinking about the problem associated with the point being zero dimensional, and was not able to explain the problem. I started exploring it, and was then able to clarify it a bit. (23/1/17)
What determines weirdness? (B11P162, < 29/1/17)
Principles/Often Seen Determined Conformations On Categorization| < 22/1/17: Nothing yet...
Dissolution Of Questions| 18/1/17: Experience (E)| I had a question w.r.t the evolution of mind seeking race game for determination of oracles, or a related one, which disappeared when I got into the data in the article The Origins Of Board Games And Ancient Game Boards. (18/1/17)
Restricting Thinking| 18/1/17: Experience (E)| I have seen in class that most of them don't like to think into certain depth area, are they thinking of getting stuck? (Clarification required, 18/1/17)
Is there any resistance element to execute thinking? (18/1/17)
Exploration:
Exploratory Way Structure Vs. Real Structure| 18/1/17: Exploration Notion (EN)| Am I exploring in the ways, which the explored don't go in reality? Is exploratory way structure, a real structure?
Exploration Tools| 17/1/17: Experience (E)| I saw that the exploratory way of the word "rate" gave raise to many other explorations.
Try observing and fixing general exploratory conformations. (17/1/17)
Exploratory Track Bias| 17/1/17: Experience (E)| I was comparing Indian currency with other nations; I was the cheapest country (Cape town, South Africa?) to live in. Then, I thought I should come in the origins order, and thought of knowing economics then. Am I biasing more to know more on certain things? (Clarification required, 17/1/17)
Need Of Data/Experience: Should I Use The Existing One Or Should I Identify/Explore On My Own?| 17/1/17: Recent Past Linked Experience (RPLE)| I explored Springer journal, it has articles on identifications I desired (the one I searched there was on evolution in all the processes). (17/1/17)
Thought Rate Vs. Experience Rate| 17/1/17: Nothing yet...
Automated/Broad Exploration Space Dissolution And The Blocking Of One's Thinking On What He/She Is Doing| 17/1/17: Experience (E)| I observed that, I was putting all the thoughts coming to me into the blog, which seemed to be at high pace, was not leaving me to think on what I was doing. (17/1/17)
Measuring The Strength Of Thought| 15/1/17: Nothing yet...
Conceiving Ability Vs. Memory Ability Of Storing The Conceived And Building Upon It (Memory Length Ability Of Holding The Dependent Elements Contributing To The Structure)| 15/1/17: Experience (E)| Blog seems to be helping in storing the conceived or holding the fade notions, to help me have the incremental faster development in my thinking. (B11P157, 15/1/17)
Does the construction require the memory of the previous structure? Are then these all structural elements not independent? (15/1/17)
Thoughts (T)| Books seems to have greater connected thoughts presented at a time to the reader, which might help in bringing reader to the next evolutionary stage within the short time due to the high length of the memory of connected dependent elements. (Clarification required, 15/1/17)
Unique Identity For Discovered Path | 13/1/17: Most the identification of the relations in the world seems to have different representations; it seems difficult to know whether a particular needed discovery has been made or not; this might create multiple discoveries of the same. Is there a way of representing the uniqueness of the discoveries to make them navigation-friendly? (14/1/17)
Chance Nature In The Generation Of Thought | 10/1/17: Experience (E) | I was able to think on a particular way upon having certain experience.
Thought (T) | Is it always possible to have the right experience to make progress in one's thinking? Isn't there a chance nature here, if yes, can we eliminate it? (10/1/17)
Flow of Thinking Per Experience Unit | 9/1/17: Nothing yet...
Experience Vs. Thinking | 9/1/17: Try identifying the unidentified arena of this view. (9/1/17)
Is thinking a process needed for looking the experience to be had next for ones need? (9/1/17)
Conceiving Possibilities| < 3/1/17: You seem to be conceiving possibilities without checking its existence. Won't there be many such possibilities? How are you going to check them all? (clarification required; mind block-stop; exploration pending)
Human Reasoning Mechanism | <12/08/2016: Nothing yet...
Problems with Collaboratory Thinking | <12/08/2016: Nothing yet...
Law of Conservation of Thinking!: Experience: Use Linear Programming Problems experience, where you were trying to use your own thinking, but the general graphical method used to cover all the thinking. Think more on this with respect to conservation of thinking.
High Dozed Focus Analysis!: I need to create an algorithm for exploring the thought completely. (16/06/2016)
Think more on how many thoughts/conclusions can be derived from a single input thought/data. Make sure to optimize this for complete utilization of data received. (B5P80, 03/07/2016)
Every time after the completion of receiving the data, ask this question "Have you completely thought or analyzed this data?". (B5P80, 03/07/2016)
Action: Everyone seems to run by a particular reasoning which might push towards a majority side, but few get stuck with particular reasoning either the (mostly) unverified one, which they think to be right, thus will react in a different manner for the risks they face. (27/03/2016)
The general reasoning behavior seems to make everyone to act as if to be automated but there do exist anomalous reasoning which brings undiscovered arena to experience. (<14/06/2016)
Setting Up the Brain: I should try understanding how my brain searches for information, using that I should optimize my organization of searching. (10/06/2016)
Thinking Clearly: I need to think a way on solving the problems quickly, by detecting the problem cause quickly. (01/06/2016)
I should not have more assumptions in my thought, as it makes a narrow non-general thought and thus would also trouble with thinking on other specific cases. (B6P24, 02/07/2016)
Intuition seems to be the possibility conceived either with known or unknown assumptions, or without assumptions. Or it seems to be the thinking conclusion which our mind seems to make, whose path of attainment of conclusion seems to be difficult to trace because of its brisk nature; the art of tracing the path or verifying the path itself seems to be the path of logic or it can be (?) said as the act which is performed for verification to locate the assumptions. (B5P76, 03/07/2016)
[Gen] Measurement of reduction in labor per unit measure of thinking | < 7/1/17: Nothing yet...
Against/Beyond Reasoning| < 28/1/17: Nothing yet...
Reason Friendly System| 26/1/17: Experience (E)| I thought on understanding the origins of every concept I study, but college seems to be moving fast in teaching them. My reasoning of studying concepts deeply seems to be not fitting here in this system, because of time constraint. Shouldn't there be any bonus-kind feature for me? I may not be able to maintain the time properly, or I may not have studied concepts before itself. But, this context, even if it is false in my case, might give a notion of reason-friendly system. (26/1/17)
Stuck| 26/1/17: When you are stuck, try reverting back to the simplest case (with less problems, to enable detection of all the problem elements in the order of difficulty), go slow depending on the context. (26/1/17)
Continuation Of Default Conformations Due To Deficient Thinking Exploration| 24/1/17: Nothing yet...
Blocking Of Processing| < 22/1/17: Experience Notion (EN)| Sometimes I fail to process what others are trying to say. (23/1/117)
Consequences Of Weirdness| < 22/1/17: Notion Origins (NO)| I was always thinking about the problem associated with the point being zero dimensional, and was not able to explain the problem. I started exploring it, and was then able to clarify it a bit. (23/1/17)
What determines weirdness? (B11P162, < 29/1/17)
Principles/Often Seen Determined Conformations On Categorization| < 22/1/17: Nothing yet...
Dissolution Of Questions| 18/1/17: Experience (E)| I had a question w.r.t the evolution of mind seeking race game for determination of oracles, or a related one, which disappeared when I got into the data in the article The Origins Of Board Games And Ancient Game Boards. (18/1/17)
Restricting Thinking| 18/1/17: Experience (E)| I have seen in class that most of them don't like to think into certain depth area, are they thinking of getting stuck? (Clarification required, 18/1/17)
Is there any resistance element to execute thinking? (18/1/17)
Exploration:
Exploratory Way Structure Vs. Real Structure| 18/1/17: Exploration Notion (EN)| Am I exploring in the ways, which the explored don't go in reality? Is exploratory way structure, a real structure?
Exploration Tools| 17/1/17: Experience (E)| I saw that the exploratory way of the word "rate" gave raise to many other explorations.
Try observing and fixing general exploratory conformations. (17/1/17)
Exploratory Track Bias| 17/1/17: Experience (E)| I was comparing Indian currency with other nations; I was the cheapest country (Cape town, South Africa?) to live in. Then, I thought I should come in the origins order, and thought of knowing economics then. Am I biasing more to know more on certain things? (Clarification required, 17/1/17)
Need Of Data/Experience: Should I Use The Existing One Or Should I Identify/Explore On My Own?| 17/1/17: Recent Past Linked Experience (RPLE)| I explored Springer journal, it has articles on identifications I desired (the one I searched there was on evolution in all the processes). (17/1/17)
Thought Rate Vs. Experience Rate| 17/1/17: Nothing yet...
Automated/Broad Exploration Space Dissolution And The Blocking Of One's Thinking On What He/She Is Doing| 17/1/17: Experience (E)| I observed that, I was putting all the thoughts coming to me into the blog, which seemed to be at high pace, was not leaving me to think on what I was doing. (17/1/17)
Measuring The Strength Of Thought| 15/1/17: Nothing yet...
Conceiving Ability Vs. Memory Ability Of Storing The Conceived And Building Upon It (Memory Length Ability Of Holding The Dependent Elements Contributing To The Structure)| 15/1/17: Experience (E)| Blog seems to be helping in storing the conceived or holding the fade notions, to help me have the incremental faster development in my thinking. (B11P157, 15/1/17)
Does the construction require the memory of the previous structure? Are then these all structural elements not independent? (15/1/17)
Thoughts (T)| Books seems to have greater connected thoughts presented at a time to the reader, which might help in bringing reader to the next evolutionary stage within the short time due to the high length of the memory of connected dependent elements. (Clarification required, 15/1/17)
Unique Identity For Discovered Path | 13/1/17: Most the identification of the relations in the world seems to have different representations; it seems difficult to know whether a particular needed discovery has been made or not; this might create multiple discoveries of the same. Is there a way of representing the uniqueness of the discoveries to make them navigation-friendly? (14/1/17)
Chance Nature In The Generation Of Thought | 10/1/17: Experience (E) | I was able to think on a particular way upon having certain experience.
Thought (T) | Is it always possible to have the right experience to make progress in one's thinking? Isn't there a chance nature here, if yes, can we eliminate it? (10/1/17)
Flow of Thinking Per Experience Unit | 9/1/17: Nothing yet...
Experience Vs. Thinking | 9/1/17: Try identifying the unidentified arena of this view. (9/1/17)
Is thinking a process needed for looking the experience to be had next for ones need? (9/1/17)
Conceiving Possibilities| < 3/1/17: You seem to be conceiving possibilities without checking its existence. Won't there be many such possibilities? How are you going to check them all? (clarification required; mind block-stop; exploration pending)
Human Reasoning Mechanism | <12/08/2016: Nothing yet...
Problems with Collaboratory Thinking | <12/08/2016: Nothing yet...
Law of Conservation of Thinking!: Experience: Use Linear Programming Problems experience, where you were trying to use your own thinking, but the general graphical method used to cover all the thinking. Think more on this with respect to conservation of thinking.
High Dozed Focus Analysis!: I need to create an algorithm for exploring the thought completely. (16/06/2016)
Think more on how many thoughts/conclusions can be derived from a single input thought/data. Make sure to optimize this for complete utilization of data received. (B5P80, 03/07/2016)
Every time after the completion of receiving the data, ask this question "Have you completely thought or analyzed this data?". (B5P80, 03/07/2016)
Action: Everyone seems to run by a particular reasoning which might push towards a majority side, but few get stuck with particular reasoning either the (mostly) unverified one, which they think to be right, thus will react in a different manner for the risks they face. (27/03/2016)
The general reasoning behavior seems to make everyone to act as if to be automated but there do exist anomalous reasoning which brings undiscovered arena to experience. (<14/06/2016)
Setting Up the Brain: I should try understanding how my brain searches for information, using that I should optimize my organization of searching. (10/06/2016)
Thinking Clearly: I need to think a way on solving the problems quickly, by detecting the problem cause quickly. (01/06/2016)
I should not have more assumptions in my thought, as it makes a narrow non-general thought and thus would also trouble with thinking on other specific cases. (B6P24, 02/07/2016)
Intuition seems to be the possibility conceived either with known or unknown assumptions, or without assumptions. Or it seems to be the thinking conclusion which our mind seems to make, whose path of attainment of conclusion seems to be difficult to trace because of its brisk nature; the art of tracing the path or verifying the path itself seems to be the path of logic or it can be (?) said as the act which is performed for verification to locate the assumptions. (B5P76, 03/07/2016)
[Gen] Measurement of reduction in labor per unit measure of thinking | < 7/1/17: Nothing yet...
Comments
Post a Comment